In partnership with
Recently, the Head of Product at X, Nikita Bier, wrote something that made many creators pause.
He said people come to X to “get a pulse on humanity.”
And that the platform must resist anything that misrepresents or adulterates that pulse.
He also said there’s nothing more unsettling than thinking you’re reading a human… only to find it was a machine or an undisclosed entity.
That sounds serious.
So the question is obvious:
Is he saying creators shouldn’t use AI?
Not exactly.
But he is drawing a line.
Let’s separate emotion from interpretation
Nikita Bier did not say:
“AI is not allowed.”
“Using AI tools will be punished.”
“Creators must write everything manually.”
What he focused on was something more specific:
Misrepresentation.
The issue isn’t AI assistance.
The issue is pretending something is human when it’s not.
That’s a trust problem.
X positions itself as the global town square
A place where people come to sense real human thought, reaction, perspective.
If large portions of the conversation become synthetic without disclosure, the “pulse” becomes distorted.
That’s what unsettles people.
Not the tool.
The deception.
Ad Break!
First sponsor today: Check out what TABS is offering!
The Architecture Behind AI-Native Revenue Automation
In our new white paper, The Architecture Behind AI-Native Revenue Automation, Tabs CTO Deepak Bapat breaks down what it actually takes to apply AI to revenue workflows without breaking the books.
You’ll learn why probabilistic reasoning isn’t enough for finance, how Tabs pairs LLMs with deterministic logic, and why a unified Commercial Graph is the foundation for scalable, audit-ready automation. From contract interpretation to cash application, this paper goes deep on where AI belongs—and where it absolutely doesn’t.
If you’re evaluating AI for billing, collections, or revenue operations, this is the architecture perspective most vendors won’t show you.
… back to the article 👇
There’s a difference between:
Using AI to refine your thinking,
and
Outsourcing your thinking entirely.
There’s also a difference between:
Enhancing your voice,
and
Simulating a voice that isn’t yours.
Most creators are using AI as a tool.
Drafting. Editing. Structuring. Ideation.
That is not the same as running automated personas or undisclosed bot networks.
But from the outside, the line can look blurry.
And that’s why confusion spreads.
Here’s what I believe Nikita is really signaling:
The future of X will prioritize authenticity signals.
Not anti-AI.
Pro-human.
That means:
Disclosure may matter more.
Automation without transparency may face friction.
Accounts that feel synthetic may struggle long term.
This is about trust architecture.
Not banning tools.
2nd Ad Break!
Check out what HAYSTACK is offering!
Transform Internal Comms Chaos Into Clarity
Simplify internal comms with Haystack. Publish updates, maintain approval workflows, and track engagement—all from a single platform designed to reduce chaos and keep employees aligned.
… the article continues below 👇
If you’re a creator, here’s the practical question:
Does your content still feel like you?
AI can polish language.
It can help structure ideas.
It can accelerate output.
But it cannot replace lived experience, conviction, perspective.
If your audience cannot feel you behind the words, you’re at risk. Not because AI is forbidden, but because trust erodes quietly.
There’s also a strategic layer:
As AI-generated content increases, human signal becomes more valuable.
Original thought.
Clear positioning.
Consistent voice.
In an environment saturated with generative tools, discernment becomes competitive advantage.
Ironically, AI may raise the value of authentic humans.
Last Ad Break today: Check out what WISPR FLOW is offering
Stop typing prompts. Start talking.
You think 4x faster than you type. So why are you typing prompts?
Wispr Flow turns your voice into ready-to-paste text inside any AI tool. Speak naturally - include "um"s, tangents, half-finished thoughts - and Flow cleans everything up. You get polished, detailed prompts without touching a keyboard.
Developers use Flow to give coding agents the context they actually need. Researchers use it to describe experiments in full detail. Everyone uses it to stop bottlenecking their AI workflows.
89% of messages sent with zero edits. Millions of users worldwide. Available on Mac, Windows, iPhone, and now Android (free and unlimited on Android during launch).
…Back to topic 👇
So no, this is not a “don’t use AI” message
It’s a “don’t misrepresent reality” message.
If you use AI:
Use it deliberately.
Use it transparently if needed.
Use it to enhance your thinking, not replace it.
The pulse of humanity doesn’t disappear because tools evolve.
It disappears when creators stop taking responsibility for their voice.
And that part is still fully human.
PS: If this helped clarify the confusion, forward it to a creator who’s unsure where the line is.
The conversation isn’t about tools. It’s about trust.
Enjoying this newsletter and want to start your own? I built a guide specifically for beginners, starting from zero. Grab your copy below 👇
Beehiiv for Beginners
Build, launch, and grow your first newsletter even if you’ve never done this before
If you want to support my work, you can Buy me a coffee here. Thank you 🥰
Sign up for Beehiv. Use this link below to get a 30-day Free Trial and 20% off your first 3 months:
See you on the next one
Karata♡